ObjectiveTo systematically review the risk factors of retreatment pulmonary tuberculosis with unfavorable treatment outcome. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including CNKI, VIP, CBM and WanFang Date from inception to November 15th 2015, to collect studies about the risk factors of retreatment pulmonary tuberculosis patients with unfavorable treatment outcome. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 13 studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that significant association was found between retreatment pulmonary tuberculosis cases with unfavorable treatment outcome and such factors as the standard retreatment regimen (OR=4.98, 95%CI 2.95 to 8.39, P < 0.00001), drug-resistance (OR=4.22, 95%CI 1.85 to 9.63, P=0.0006), multi-drug resistance (OR=7.19, 95%CI 2.51 to 20.58, P=0.0002), status of cavitas (OR=1.80, 95%CI 1.20 to 2.71, P=0.005), TB-diabetes mellitus (OR=2.05, 95%CI 1.30 to 3.22, P=0.002) and high sputum smear load >2+(OR=2.07, 95%CI 1.30 to 3.29, P=0.002) in univariate-analysis, respectively. But, in multivariate-analysis, only TB-diabetes mellitus (OR=3.38, 95%CI 1.56 to 7.29, P=0.002) showed significant association with retreatment pulmonary tuberculosis cases with unfavorable treatment outcome. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that TB-diabetes mellitus, standard retreatment regimen, drug-resistance, multi-drug resistance, status of cavitas and high sputum smear load >2+ are considered to be the risk factors for retreatment pulmonary tuberculosis cases with unfavorable treatment outcome. Especially, for patients with diabetes, the importance of management need to be reinforced to reduce the failure rate in the retreatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo analyze the reasons for the failure of scleral buckling (SB) in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, and observe the efficacy and safety of re-buckling.MethodsThis was a retrospective non-comparative clinical research. From July 2014 to June 2020, patients with first-time SB failure who visited the Beijing Tongren Hospital were included in this study. There were 42 patients, including 30 males and 12 females, with the average age of 29.40±16.13 years, and they were all monocular. The retinal detachment range＜1, 1-2 and＞2 quadrants were 9, 22 and 11 eyes, respectively. The macula was involved in 38 eyes. The average logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.99±0.57. Forty eyes and 2 eyes were performed 1 and 2 SB, and all the retina were not reattached. All patients were under general anesthesia, according to the conditions during the operation, re-freeze and located the holes under indirect ophthalmoscope. And selected the new external pressure material or retained the old one in combination with the other operations to reattaced the retina. The average follow-up time was 31.93±18.97 months. The reasons for the failure of the first surgery based on the records of this surgery were analyzed. The visual acuity changes, the rate of retinal reattachment and the occurrence of complications were observed. The visual changes were compared by paired t test.ResultsThe top three reasons for the failure were: 16 case of the displacement of the compression spine (38.10%); 9 cases of missing the retinal holes and 9 case of improper selection of compression substances (account for 21.43%, respectively); 6 cases of insufficient height of compression spine (14.29%). All of retina were reattached (100%, 42/42). The average logMAR BCVA was 0.52±0.40. The difference of logMAR BCVA between before and after surgery was statistically significant (t=6.106, P=0.000). There were a slight increase in intraocular pressure in 8 eyes, the average intraocular pressure was 25.00±2.61 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). No serious complications occurred after surgery.ConclusionsThe position deviation of the compression spine, the missed hole during the operation, the improper selection of external compression material, and the insufficient height of the compression spine are the main reasons for the failure of SB. After adjusting the reasons for the failure, there is still a higher rate of retinal reattachment.